Wednesday, November 18, 2020

LIVING IN EXISTENTIAL AND EXPONENTIAL TIMES

Bananas are great. I believe they are the only known cure for existential dread. ~ Anne Lamott[1]      

Many of us expect better opportunities to emerge beginning in just 63 days. Our great expectations surrounding President Biden’s inauguration are embraced by positives, yet tinged with some trepidation. After all, #45’s bacchanal has 62 days remaining and tetchy Mitch will likely continue to be running the Senate.

Fortunately, Joe Biden already has been operating in many ways as our acting president (without portfolio), while #45 remains in his bunker at 1600 spouting dystopian fantasies and playing mulligan mini-golf. Irony abounds as our nation’s most presidential person is now resides in Delaware. Such is the yin and yang of this post-election’s politics.

The president and his craven sycophants have all too successfully and fraudulently branded Dems as socialists and defunders of police. The Repubs have gained 8 members in the House; giving the Dems the slimmest House majority in 20 years; and have an uphill battle on January 5 to gain a one-person edge in the Senate. Nevertheless, I doggedly remain an optimista.

These times, especially involving the coronavirus’ increasing onslaught, have brought forward several examples of inflation. No, not the economic kind when overall prices rise. We thankfully haven’t seen noteworthy price inflation since 2014.  

The inflation I am referring to is linguistically based and cannot be remedied by any action of the Federal Reserve. Nope, it’s emanating from the fingertips of media writers.

I have noticed an increasing use of two words, “existential” and “exponential” to describe what’s been happening here in the land of the free and home of the brave. These words often explain two inter-related events, the covid-19 pandemic and the November election.

After their common first two letters, the words diverge into very different realms. The rising use of both of these words has been initiated because of their connotative values which refer to emotional or cultural associations that the word carries, in addition to its literal meaning. I’ll first take a tour of existential.

Existential.  Existential can be defined as relating to, or affirming existence; grounded in existence or the experience of existence. Its connotative value often refers to a negative feeling or event, like existential angst, dread, crisis, threat or challenge. The use of existential essentially magnifies the feeling, angst or crisis beyond a simple, every-day ordinary one.

We have been enduring a large number of non-ordinary events and feelings. Thus, it’s not surprising that existential’s use has climbed more than 120%, according to Google.

The ghastly coronavirus crisis and the fraught presidential election each have offered media doyens much opportunity to describe a variety of events as existential. Before and after the election existential has been used to portray crises, political disagreements, terror and issues. A small and totally-unscientific sample of articles where authors have employed existential to describe terror, fights and issues includes this one, as well as this one and this one and lastly, this one that describes an existential crisis that’s wedging professional golf. Who’d have guessed?

Remarkably, existential has its own associated philosophy – existentialism. If you took Philosophy 101 in college you might remember existentialism with a small dose of mental, but not existential, strain. Here’s my strictly amateur synopsis of existentialism.

Existentialism is centered around the personal human exploration of the nature of existence. From its perspective the individual commences his/her inquiry from a point of “existential angst” and attempts to live their life earnestly with authenticity, based on their actions. In the late 19th- and 20th-century Soren Kierkegaard, Fredrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, Simone de Beauvoir and Jean Paul Sartre were among the first existentialist movers and shakers.

Generally speaking, they thought that each individual — not religion or culture — is responsible for giving meaning to life and, through individual action, living it authentically. Existentialists are interested in closely examining existence, especially human existence. Sartre said, Man is fully responsible for his nature and his choices; and, Freedom is what you do with what’s been done to you.

Existentialists, through proper action, hope to triumph over the absurdity of existence. As such, existentialism is the opposite of nihilism. Nihilists are skeptical of everything and claim there is no god, no heaven or hell. Their predisposition leads to conceiving there can be no right or wrong.

My most memorable contact with nihilism came when I first watched one of my all-time great movies, “The Big Lebowski.” In it Jeff Bridges stars as Jeffrey "The Dude" Lebowski, a slacker middle-aged bachelor with a fondness for cannabis and bowling. In a memorable scene, he’s assaulted by the Nihilists: Uli, Dieter, Franz along with their ferret. Uli tells The Dude, “Ve believes in nossing.” The Dude abides.

If you want to dive deeper into existentialism, I suggest reading At the Existentialist Café, which a good friend recommended. In her book author Sarah Bakewell uses the literary conceit of a café to describe existential luminaries and their beliefs. Her literary café is perhaps modeled after a meeting between Sartre and his philosopher buddy Raymond Aron likely at the Café de Flore shown below, where Aron pointed to his glass on the table, telling Sartre perhaps only in half-jest, “You can make a philosophy out of this cocktail.” No mention if his cocktail was a Parisian Absinthe or not.

Café de Flore, Paris

But M. Aron’s was a drink (and food) for thought then, as well as currently. One lesser-known impact of covid-19 has been a strong increase in alcohol sales. In June, alcohol sales at brick and mortar stores nationwide were up 26% year-over-year. Spirits’ sales were up 35%, wine up 29% and beer up 21%. Ah, alcohol and existential challenges go together like a horse and carriage.

Having imbibed in things existential, I now turn to exponentials, which are somewhat less pliable.

Exponential.  Why has the media attached itself to "exponential?" To answer I first define exponential and briefly examine its mathematical basis. Feel free to skip this and the next paragraph if you want to escape the math, no worries. Exponential is succinctly defined as: of or relating to an exponent. Exponentiation is a mathematical operation. As you may recall from algebra, an exponent is a symbol written above and to the right of a mathematical expression to indicate the action of raising to a power. In the following example, the exponent is 2; 32 is 3 to the power of 2, or 3 squared, which equals 9.

An exponential equation in its simplest form is written as Y = bn, involving two independent numbers, the base b and the exponent or power n, “Y = b raised to the power of n." When n is a positive integer, exponentiation corresponds to repeated multiplication of the base. That is, bn is the product of multiplying together n bases:

      Exponential’s key connotative meaning is high, unending increase. The word exponential is being used exponentially by the media when it comes to describing the growth of coronavirus cases and deaths. They are both swelling big-time after an all too brief respite in late-summer between the spring surge and the current one.

It’s not just expansionary growth, it’s seemingly huger exponential growth. All too many healthcare professionals describe their perilous current state as "It keeps rising and rising, and we’re all running on fear. The health care system is going to collapse, no question." No wonder exponential has become more prominently applied, independent of what actual covid growth is.

Exponentials are a bit tricky mathematically speaking. Expressing ever-rising growth in exponential terms requires that the base (b, above) and the exponent (n, above) be positive integers. If n is zero, then Y is always 0 no matter what the base is. If n is 1, then Y is the number itself because any number raised to the power of 1 is the number itself. If the base, b, is less than 1 or n is less than 1 there’s no positive change/growth at all, Y will be negatively sloped. In fact, virtually any growth rate can be characterized as exponential. It all depends on the values of the exponent and the base.

Needless to say, media writers don’t bother with these intricacies. All of their statements implicitly assume a positive exponent more than 1 and a base greater than 1.

Usage of the word exponential has increased 25% according to Google; far less than that of existential. Recent media stories have used exponential in the following ways.

  •       “The virus has now entered a stage of exponential growth that will be hard to halt with minor actions.”
  •      “With no new curbs, exponential growth could continue for weeks.”
  •    “As the pandemic seeps into every area of the country and scientists warn of exponential growth ahead of the holidays.”
  •       "We are nearing a phase of exponential growth, if we haven't entered it already."
  •       And illustrating that exponential is not limited only to referencing covid growth, here’s “State of the art uses of artificial intelligence (AI) in treating diseases and disorders of the brain have shown exponential growth.”

Exponential and existential have become watchwords for these times, courtesy of the virus and the media.

Our up-coming Thanksgiving holiday will pose its own challenges. As one UCSF doctor mentioned, “I’m massively worried. If you wanted to design something to make [coronavirus] things go worse, you would have designed Thanksgiving exactly when it’s coming.” Here’s hoping your turkey, stuffing, green-bean casserole and cranberry sauce is just tasty, not unhealthy. Take good care.

 


[1] Anne, in the store you can find these bananas right next to existential bread. 




Thursday, November 5, 2020

AND THE WINNER IS…

Punctuality is the virtue of the bored. ~ Evelyn Waugh 

Even though I realize the presidential election final results’ announcement was going to be prolonged, I’m still astonishingly anxious. Sure, this anxiety is because soooo many citizens voted and the results are soooo close. But still I want to know the winner, now.

Then I realized the answer is now readily available to me and other folks. I just wasn’t thinking about victory correctly.

The winner of the 2020 Magic-Board Master election is Steve Kornacki (of the MSNBC party), his compatriot John King comes in a very close second at CNN.

Steve Kornacki

Big Congratulations Steve! You have been giving it your all. You, and John, were presidential in your comportment, authority, knowledge, honesty, self-assuredness and poise. And, I remain amazed at how you have been able to say the same basic thing, ever so repeatedly with aplomb and style. You got talent!

It’s exactly these characteristics that I look for in a successful executive. As the 2020 Election magic-board-master (EMBM), Steve you get all my college’s votes. You’re the very best.

Your impressive exploits come very, very close to several other stellar board masters of the past. I’m thinking of Tony Hawk and Shaun White, shown below in action. Steve, presenting you with the EMBM gold medal was a bit of a challenge, given your worthy challengers, but you won the ever-so-important quadrennial electronic boarding event.  

 

Tony Hawk                                                                                                                   Shaun White

     Let’s fervently hope Joe eventually pulls it off and receives his own gold medal as #46 on January 20, despite the challenges facing him, including a nearly mission impossible. Onward…