Showing posts with label Gavin Newsom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gavin Newsom. Show all posts

Monday, July 24, 2023

EV MISSION POSSIBLE?

Porsche is the last bastion of petrolheads. So when they start making electric vehicles, you know the world has changed. ~ Chris Harris 

The world has changed.[1] President Joe Biden has mandated that at least one-half of all new passenger vehicles sold in America after 2030 will be electric vehicles (EVs). Governor Gavin Newsom has ordered that only zero-emission new passenger vehicles – aka, EVs – will be sold in California after 2035. None of the Californians who own the 14.3 million cars now registered in CA will be allowed to trade them in for another internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle. Car consumers will only be allowed to buy an EV.

Let me guess how popular, let alone equitable, that will be in a few years. New climate policies like Joe and Gavin have established will fundamentally change the transportation sector, among others. Analogous policies are already facing popular backlash in Europe. The Netherlands and Germany already have been forced to backtrack on several of their green climate policies’ implementation.

US EV sales have continued to increase notably. By some accounts, they now represent about 5% of all registered vehicles in the US. And yet Joe’s and Gavin’s beyond-optimistic EV goals are not going to be realized for a host of reasons. Gavin’s official duties will be long past; Joe’s hopefully not, depending on Nov. 5, 2024. No matter, they each wouldn’t be much affected by such slippage. But we will be. 

The most prominent challenges are daunting supply-side constraints for continued growth in the EV market. In order to meet these fantastic objectives many millions of US-produced batteries and EVs will be required very soon, along with installation of many more EV charging stations that will reliably provide needed kWh “fuel” across much of the nation’s landscape. A key domestic issue remains how American utilities can dependably supply all the additional electricity needed to charge evermore EVs. 

China remains the foremost producer of battery metals, battery cells and components, as well as finished EV batteries and EVs. China produces nearly 7 times the number of EVs as the US does. It controls 82% of world EV battery production and key battery production technologies as well as dominant access to crucial battery materials like copper, nickel, lithium and other rare earth metals. 

Beyond moral suasion and expensive financial offerings like the federal incentive to buy a qualified EV, Joe and Gavin have no real inducements to offer ICE vehicle owners to trade in their vehicles. As of April, the average EV price remains a sizeable 24.1% higher than an average ICE vehicle (over $11,000 more). That’s considerably more than the federal $7,500 tax credit/rebate for buying a new EV. This matter of EV pricing is where inevitable equity-related concerns about EVs and Gavin’s 2035 proclamation will certainly arise. After all, in California the price of electricity will soon depend on each customer’s income level. Postponements in the 2030 and 2035 calendar dates is practically preordained.

Rebates appear necessary at this point, but probably not sufficient for more typical car-buying folks to trade up to a more-expensive EV. Especially when the federal EV incentives have already become ever-changing and hopelessly complex. The revised, convoluted federal EV inducements are more focused on incentivizing EV component producers to locate in the US rather than clearly providing purchasers with money to buy an EV.

The president and the governor need help to ensure needed EV components are available and induce ordinary Americans – like Jim and Mary Van with their 2 mini-Vans – to actually buy EVs . Current EV policy objectives seem like a mission impossible because of such formidable challenges.

What can be done? Hire Tom Cruise. Significantly expanding EV sales and EV infrastructure may be vanquished unless Joe and Gavin convince Tom to engage in another special mission impossible. Tom will need to turn EV sales into something loftier and improve the befuddled EV system. They should give Tom a shot against adversity in an unexpected 8th Mission Impossible (M.I.) adventure to re-craft the governments’ EV policies and convince consumers to purchase them.

With his proven talents I’m confident Tom can turn the EV market into Mission Possible (M.P.). Without him, it will remain impossible.


Tom cruising during M.I. Rogue Nation 

 Tom, aka Ethan Mathew Hunt in his M.I. escapades, has the skills and chutzpah to create EV success with the vehicle-buying public. After all he’s retrieved deadly viruses (M.I.#2), rescued the Rabbit’s Foot (#3), battled the evil Syndicate (#5) and saved Luther from the vile Apostles (#6). Fortunately, he takes shit from exactly no one and isn’t burdened by excessive EV industry knowledge. In his latest M.I. movie, Dead Reckoning Part Uno, he’s after the malicious Entity and incongruently seems to prefer driving a petite Fiat 500 very fast through a European city’s very narrow, medieval streets. Impressivo, as always.

There’s much for Tom to do in EV world. Most recently, the US accounts for only 6% of global EV battery production. No US firms are in our planet's top 10 EV battery producers. They are either Chinese or South Korean companies. There is only one active lithium mine now operating in the US that accounts for just 1% of global production. Others are planned, but creating a productive lithium mine can take up to 10 years. The US market share of EVs is roughly one 12th of Norway’s share.

The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act is offering $394 billion in energy and climate funding to qualified firms and consumers. By necessity, many US firms – including major US vehicle manufacturers – are now planning to produce more EVs and their key components like batteries. Massive EV battery production facilities can take 5 years to build, quixotically assuming that none of the usually-lengthy regulatory and operational lags appear. They already have.

Multi-billion dollar US battery-production facilities – gigafactories – on average cost 46% more to construct in the US than in China. Current information indicates that existing US based gigafactories employ about 8,500 employees. Significantly more will be needed to ensure that half of all American passenger vehicle sales will be EVs in just 7 years, and be consistent with the president’s goals that strongly emphasize domestic production.

Should Tom choose to accept it, this M.P. adventure will be unlike any of his previous M.I. ones. It won’t involve many of the physically-astounding feats he’s deservedly famous for. Nope, this adventure will instead require him to creatively gnash together the heads and hearts of an ensemble of quintessentially important EV people in our public and private spheres. Tom will also need to talk with current EV owners and potential EV purchasers to understand their important demand-side perspectives.

These people often have conflicting visions of EV-dom. If anyone can clear up the problematic EV goals, increase EV battery production and EV sales inside the good ol’ USofA as well as fashioning an immaculate decrease in EV prices, it’s Tom Cruise. He can fuel up consumer demand for EVs among the masses of US car buyers (not just richer folks who’ve generally bought EVs so far) and modify pollyannish government goals to realize success. If Tom can spark the broad opportunities and benefits associated with transforming US vehicle transportation, he’ll command our enduring gratitude. If he’s triumphant, I’ll be in a front row seat for Dead Reckoning Part Due, Tre and Quatro. We’re all counting on you Tom.

 



[1] Porsche does indeed make an EV, the Taycan. A Bay Area Porsche dealer offers the Taycan Turbo S for $230,090. That’s a bit more expensive than the Chevy Bolt LT’s MSRP of $28,795. 


 

Wednesday, February 3, 2021

COVID VACCINE DISTRIBUTION IS A MESS

 Everyone has a plan until I punch them in the face. ~ Andrew Cuomo     

It is no surprise that the distribution of Covid vaccines has proven challenging. Getting precious vaccine into 330 million Americans’ arms was never going to be a slam dunk, given the fractionalized nature of our healthcare system.

We should not downplay or forget the astonishing success of the development of these vaccines. The vaccines were created with technological brilliance at near light-speed –with $18.5 billion of federal government support. But the vaccines’ distribution is another matter.

Supply shortages of the Covid vaccines have been expected and present since Day 0 of their distribution. This scarcity have been mostly sidestepped by politicians. They rarely couch their Covid pronouncements with clarity about how long increases in vaccine supply may happen, except to make generic (and optimistic) statements about the future.

With my medium-priority status as an ancient diabetic in mid-December I estimated there would be 124 miles of people ahead of me in Alameda County’s line to get the vaccine. That translated into my being in back of 2,954 miles of folks in California’s line. While proverbially waiting in either line, I needed to remember at least to bring a camp chair and water.

Forecasts of vaccine availability have always been colossally optimistic. Last Fall, Operation Warp Speed stated there would be 300 million (M) vaccine doses available in the US by the end of 2020. By the mid-December, the CDC said it expected between 30-45M doses by yearend. In fact, only 1,008,025 doses were administered by last Christmas. Should we believe updated dosage forecasts that are stated by “experts”? I’d advise against it.

At this point, vaccine supply isn’t expected to increase at all before two months from now for the already-approved vaccines. Why? Because additional production capacity is currently unavailable.

If all the now-expected supply were used, the US could average over 2M shots per day, but state and local vaccination centers have failed to manage and use the current flow of vaccine, let alone more. So why are governors adding even more “prioritized” people to the vaccine-eligible lines with no additional supply until April?

Some relief will come once the Johnson & Johnson single-dose vaccine gets FDA emergency use approval. If expeditiously approved, the J&J vaccine might start to be available in early March according to the experts. J&J has agreed to deliver 100 million doses to the US by the end of June, assuming smooth sailing. Are you holding your breath?

Covid vaccine distribution has been a calamity in California and elsewhere. Fundamentally, the vaccines’ delivery system is founded on a conflict between the inclusive logic of having ever-more people become safer by getting fully inoculated – something politicians and everyone else wants to happen the day before yesterday – and the selective logic arising from shortages of vaccines because at any point in time there’s a fixed, inflexible supply that is far less than the public’s demand.

To reduce the shortage, vaccines have been rationed, requiring some people to be non-prioritized and thus having to wait. No public official ever uses the term rationing to describe the situation because of its fraught connotations. But that’s what is behind the CDC’s and each state’s tiers and sub-tiers. Unsurprisingly, the alluring artform for some of securing “unfair priority” to jump ahead in the line is itself reaching epidemic proportions.

As of February 1, California has vaccinated 7.2% of its residents with at least one dose, 1.5% with two doses, and utilized just 61% of all doses delivered. California ranks 38th highest of all the states for doses utilized. Each of these percentages is below the mediocre US averages. Nevertheless, thank goodness vaccination rates are slowly rising.

State politicians have established “vaccine delivery systems” that involve many interdependent moving parts among multiple agencies/institutions grating together, in which every piece needs to work rapidly, competently and seamlessly for success to occur. It hasn’t.

This week Dr. Anthony Fauci, now President Biden’s chief medical advisor, acknowledged this very problem, “You cannot give a definite answer [about when the Covid vaccine system will return us to “normal”] when you have so many moving parts.”

I’m reminded about such challenges in keeping our multi-faceted Covid vaccination systems working by this image of Charlie Chaplin in his renowned 1936 Modern Times movie. So many gears, so many parts grinding on each other that have to be kept working flawlessly together. No wonder he and we are exhausted.

Charlie Chaplin enjoying Modern Times.

California’s vaccine distribution system has been changing rapidly, which adds yet another fateful, often confusing influence on getting this essential task done timely and effectively. If it’s Wednesday, do I keep unsuccessfully calling an 800 number, or do I use the newly-introduced but error 408-laden website? The systems’ shortcomings have resulted in every relevant party pointing fingers, at others.

Gov. Newsom’s approach seems to pay only slight attention to the vaccines’ omnipresent shortages that everyone is facing despite California’s utilizing only 61% of delivered vaccines. His approach that emphasizes inclusive vaccinations has increased the demand for the vaccine. Not the supply.

Gov. Newsom announced January 13 that the state was “significantly increasing our efforts to get these vaccines administered, get them out of freezers and get them into people’s arms” by increasing the number of people eligible to receive shots to everyone 65 and over. Except sufficient vaccines aren’t available for an additional 6 ½ M elder Californians.

And the governor knows every person demanding a shot is a voter, be they a healthcare worker, elder, school teacher, parent, diabetic, firefighter, meat processing plant worker, lettuce picker, or grocery worker – virtually all of whom consider themselves “essential” in some manner.

Thus, the governor’s system has all too often worsened the situation by increasing the number of “prioritized” people who qualify for getting the vaccines, without a concomitant boost in supply, over which he has no control.

Individual states cannot directly contract with vaccine suppliers, only the federal government is allowed to. Thus, exhortations by governors like New York’s Andrew Cuomo about ordering their own vaccines have, at best, only fleeting PR value, but no legal or practical consequence.

Pfizer’s and Moderna’s production facilities have been running at full-tilt 100% capacity. As mentioned before, the intricate vaccine production process cannot change that rapidly, even if governors like Mr. Newsom somehow expect it to with the flick of a few words.

Thus, the lines get ever-longer; the public’s expectations are rarely met and people understandably get more upset and frustrated. Hence, the emergence of a misbegotten campaign to recall Newsom, promoted by the ever-endangered species, California Republicana.

Perhaps this political action is part of why Gov. Newsom last week again changed his vaccine distribution system. This time more fundamentally. Until last week, the governor’s delivery system revolved around the state’s Public Health Departments (PHDs) who had responsibility for allocating the vaccines across the State, county by county.

He shocked California’s vaccine delivery system by removing the PHDs. Critics said the PHD-based system was a piecemeal patchwork of confusion. The authority of the PHDs should have been sidelined long ago in favor of larger-scale healthcare providers who are far more experienced dealing with customers, and already have the systems to do so.

The governor’s new vaccine management-distribution system will be run by Blue Shield of California, with assistance from Kaiser Permanente, two of the largest healthcare providers who together serve more than 10M people in the state.

The PHDs have been challenged and stretched by their vaccine responsibility even before they officially started Covid vaccination management in mid-December. For years PHDs have been under-budgeted, understaffed and now they’ve became overwhelmed, which has led to their ineffectiveness. Their distribution efforts have been faulted for inflexibility, spotty data collection and a lack of statewide coordination among the 61 local health jurisdictions with regard to eligibility requirements.

One person familiar with California’s PHD-based system stated, “In short, there is no clear and easy way to tell people when it was their turn and where to go when it was.” Another knowledgeable observer said the bar for Blue Shield’s and Kaiser’s success is pretty low; “The whole thing has been managed so disastrously.”

My personal example: on January 14 I completed the online Alameda County Health Care Services’ Resident Vaccine Notification Form and submitted it – apparently to neverland. Since then, I have never received any notifications, even from Tinker Bell, about my status. On my own, I was vaccinated at Kaiser on January 19 via a phone call to Kaiser that included a 2.5 hour wait to get an appointment. Let’s hope my second dose isn’t delayed.

New York state has just made changes in its vaccine management system, similar to California for similar reasons. New York ranks 24th highest of all the states for doses utilized, at 65.7%.

After New York’s vaccine rollout became problematic and fewer available doses were actually being administered, Gov. Cuomo declined to adopt plans previously developed by the State Department of Health and local health departments. Recently he became more displeased with local public authorities’ and public hospitals’ poor performance, calling the PHDs’ operations excessively rigid. The magnitude of the pandemic had swamped New York’s public health planning efforts.

Finally, the governor said he punched the PHDs’ plans in the face, using a cheekbone-close adaptation of the famous Mike Tyson quote[1]. Late last week Gov. Cuomo announced that private hospitals now will be “hubs” for vaccine dispersal throughout the state, not PHDs.

Meanwhile back in Washington, President Biden is changing lots about #45s plebeian Covid plans. He has ordered FEMA personnel and active-duty soldiers to become directly involved with vaccine distribution. They will operate large, federally-supported vaccine centers in several states including Arizona, Nevada, Texas and Washington.

Additionally, the president’s Department of Homeland Security recommends that undocumented immigrants should be vaccinated, together perhaps with incarcerated people that others insist should be inoculated ASAP. If large numbers of such folks received dosages before “ordinary people,” it isn’t hard to imagine how badly the public might react. Such are the judgements #46 and other authorities now face.

So, here’s an FYI message to Charlie Chaplin (see above). In order to improve our Covid vaccination system, the president is adding additional large gears to the nation’s already hugely complex vaccine machinery. I’m sure you understand. Perhaps hope springs eternal with further intricacy. Let’s see how it all works, keeping every finger crossed, with uniformed and non-uniformed federal personnel now swiftly meshing with the other thousands who’ve been engaged in this herculean task for far longer. Onward towards herd immunity.



[1] Mike Tyson said “Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth,” in response to a reporter's question about whether he was worried about Evander Holyfield's fight plan before their 1996 championship fight. It turns out Mike got punched and lost the fight.