Showing posts with label George Washington. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Washington. Show all posts

Sunday, August 23, 2020

TIGHT QUARTERS

You must be the change you wish to see in the world. ~ Mahatma Gandhi 

You might have missed this, but on February 3, when a virus wasn’t an all too central part of our attention, the US Mint in Philadelphia issued its newest US quarter-dollar coin. This coin, shown below, displays our very first President, George Washington, who has continuously appeared on our quarters since 1932 – no term limits for quarters apparently. Our newest quarter celebrates American Samoa on the relief (back side), which features a mother fruit bat and her pup hanging upside down. Aren’t you numismatists now excited? 

   The newest coin is part of the US Mint's America the Beautiful Quarters Program. According to the Mint, “the image evokes the remarkable care and energy that fruit bat mothers put into their offspring. The design is intended to promote awareness to the species’ threatened status due to habitat loss and commercial hunting. The National Park of American Samoa is the only park in the United States that is home to the Samoan fruit bat."

So start swimming across the Pacific to Samoa – it’s only 4,805 miles from here – and lend assistance to these threatened fruit bats. The Philadelphia Mint is no penny ante or mere nickel and dime operation; it usually produces 13.5 billion coins every year that represent 1.2% of the nation’s money supply. This spring, there were close to $48 billion worth of coins circulating. But the Mint’s production of coin has decreased due to measures put in place to protect its employees from the virus.

There are not enough quarters, or as I’ll refer to them here, Georges. Just like TP and paper towels, the coronavirus is now blamed for a shortage of quarters. This shortage isn’t the result of more young people playing coin games like deadbox or tinks, like I used to in grade school.

Only 70-90nm in size, roughly one-hundredth as large as a human red blood cell, the coronavirus has been blamed for aggravating virtually every shortage, inequity and malady.[1] The covid-19 pandemic is everywhere. The word pandemic, first used in the mid-1600s when the Great Plagues of Europe were killing 20% to 50% of the population, comes from the Greek pan demos (all people). In a viral variant of Parkinson’s Law that cannot be masked; the coronavirus has inevitably expanded so as to fill the time available for everyone’s fears and opinions. And, of course, it’s far from over.

The only comparable, politically mesmerizing event I remember is the 1973-74 Oil Embargo when suddenly, and belatedly, we realized that oil was a vital ingredient for a vast spread of economic activity and whose supply was no longer guaranteed. This embargo incented some economists to develop a BTU theory of value which measured a good’s worth based on how many BTUs (of then very scarce oil) were required to produce it. Thankfully, a covid theory of value hasn’t evolved, yet. Has it?

Nevertheless, as everyone knows from personal experience, the coronavirus has extensively changed our behavior. These behavioral changes include how much we’ve been spending and how we’ve been paying for purchased items. Paying for stuff requires some sort of money, which for economists like me leads to talking about “types” of money and the money supply. The US money supply is managed by the Federal Reserve Bank (the Fed), our nation’s central bank.

Simply put, the larger our money supply the more spending happens. The more spending that occurs the higher our GDP. The Fed has demonstratively supported keeping the US economy relatively afloat during the covid crisis. Over the past year, the Fed has increased the money supply by nearly $1.5 trillion dollars, an amazing 38.5% growth rate. That is a whole bunch of dollars, and Georges. It’s also a prime example of big-time expansionary monetary (money supply) policy. In July, retail sales slightly increased (1.2%) for the third straight month, after significantly dropping earlier in the year.

There are several types of money, including cash (like Georges and dollars), credit and debit cards, checks, and zeros and ones (digital money). With the exception of cash, most monetary transactions end up as zeros and ones in your (or someone else’s) account.

There’s more money circulating, courtesy of the Fed, but Georges and other change are in tight supply. Because of the apparent shortage, the Fed has rationed coin supplies to banks across the country. That’s not necessarily a large macro issue because coins aren’t used in many high-value non-digital purchases. Federal Reserve research indicates coins and cash are used only in about 12% of purchases costing $100 or more. Such transactions thus don’t provide much change, which is not the same as what Mr. Gandhi was referring to at the beginning of this blog post.

But coins and other cash are used for 49% of payments below $10. That’s why laundromat operators are wondering where George is. Laundromats are quarter kings because their washers and dryers require them to operate, as you probably remember.

There are about 29,500 coin-laundries in the US, generating nearly $5 billion in annual gross revenue. It costs the typical laundromat customer about 8 quarters to wash her/his clothes and about the same to dry them. Some laundromats charge less (6 quarters), some more (16 quarters).

Most laundromats provide on-site change machines for their customers so they can use the washers and dryers. The stores’ owners/operators thus need a steady, substantial supply of Georges. That’s becoming more challenging. Charles, a laundromat owner, drives to six banks in his city every morning in search of Georges. The banks now each limit him to no more than $120 worth (480 quarters). Most recently, he’s been running low on Georges, which is bad for his business: no quarters, no washing or drying.

He and other small business-people believe the coronavirus has somehow blocked coins from circulating in the economy. Many non-essential businesses remain closed, perhaps with their unemptied register tills on the premises. People are making fewer shopping trips, and depending on the store type, buying less per visit. That is happening, but it’s not just the supply of Georges and other cash that may have shrunk because of the virus, it’s also their velocity.

Money velocity is an economic term that measures the rate (speed) at which money is exchanged for goods or services in the economy. It’s the rapidity at which people and firms spend their money. Unlike driving on the Interstate, money velocity has no regulated speed limit, it depends on the size of nation’s macroeconomic output (GDP), relative to the size of the money supply.

US money velocity has lessened over time. From the beginning of 2020 through June 30, money velocity dropped 23%, a big reduction. Velocity is at its lowest in 60 years. Lower money velocity means each dollar (and quarter) is not being used as often to buy things. This lower demand for purchasing items produces lower GDP. The US real (inflation-adjusted) GDP dropped 9.5% from the first to the second quarter of 2020.

Despite the Fed’s successful efforts to increase the overall money supply, money velocity has significantly dropped as has the supply of coins. Lower velocity mitigates some of the effects of the money supply's increase. Georges and other cash are being used less to purchase of goods and services.

Where’s George when we need him?

 



[1] The media has taken to multiplying the pandemics we’re facing, so hardly anything is left out of its realm: witness media sightings of the fashion pandemic, the housing pandemic, the wildfire pandemic, the Great Barrier Reef pandemic, the schools' laptop pandemic… 



Wednesday, July 1, 2020

MONUMENTAL PROBLEMS

Our monuments are representations of myth, not fact.” ~ Ken Burns 

 An early 20th-century European thinker wrote after WWI that “there is nothing as invisible as a monument.” During the past month, monuments have once again become not only visible, but lightning rods of attention.
Although our advancing, covid-based circumstances have brought out the humanity in many people, the media isn’t all that interested in such positivism. Far more prominent are the clashes and divergences.
     One of the latest of such clashes is what I liken to Monumental Problems. Especially those that are related in some folks’ view to events connected to the recent, unlawful and criminal deaths of Black people. The latest victims include George Floyd, Emmet Till, Michael Brown, Breonna Taylor, Rayshaard Brooks and Ahmaud Arbery who themselves have become the now-justly-memorialized foundation of the Black Lives Matter movement.
The bronze monuments of George Washington, Robert E. Lee, Robert Gould Shaw, Teddy Roosevelt and other leaders from the past have been sundered, toppled, defaced or removed by spirited crowds. Removing Mr. Lee and all of his Confederate cronies is completely warranted.
San Francisco protestors took down a statue of our 18th president, Ulysses S. Grant, whose military successes ended the Confederacy. But because he was given a slave whom he later freed before the Civil War, his sinful calumny was complete according to the activists. I don’t believe statues of President Grant should be destroyed. His personal fault is outweighed by his noteworthy and substantial public efforts to preserve the US and halt its disunion.
The protestors’ searing focus rests on specific facets of the bronzed leaders’ broad careers. The protestors, using their severe standards, want to demonstrably rectify these leaders’ past injustices. Meaning deposing these leaders’ no longer invisible statues. Thirteen (13) of our first 18 presidents were slave-holders. In retrospect, it’s a thoroughly ghastly record. The 1860 US Census documented that 12.6% of our national population – over 3.9 million people – were slaves. Should we now topple the Washington Monument because George (and Martha) had over 300 slaves at Mt. Vernon, or demolish the Jefferson Memorial because he had about 200 slaves?
The challenge is how we reconcile our distinctly-different, present-day moral judgments together with a recognition that our past describes an utterly differing nation. Can we the public resolve the protestors’ solitary focus on a single attribute of these leaders’ lives as a rationale for these statues’ destruction? Honestly, I find it difficult. Does that make me a racist?
Monument denouement is by no means new. On July 9, 1776 the Declaration of Independence was read aloud for the first time in Manhattan, NY to George Washington and his soldiers. Afterwards, his American patriots quickly went to a near-by park and toppled the statue of King George III of England, the colonies’ then-ruler. Soon thereafter the king’s lead sculpture was melted down to make musket ball-bullets for the muzzle-loading, flintlock rifles of Gen. Washington’s army. King George was thus converted into 42,088 bullets. This transmutation of the king’s statue into revolutionary ammunition has a certain exquisite irony. It was a-propos both of the patriots’ spirit of 1776, as well as the logistical realities of our war for Independence. The picture below shows a lead musket ball mold that my long-ago family ancestors used during the Revolutionary War and afterwards.


Monumental Problems are not limited to the present day nor to the US. Next year will commemorate the 150th anniversary of the toppling of Napoleon Bonaparte during the Paris Commune revolt. Not of Bonaparte’s rule or the man himself (he died 199 years ago), but of his memorial statue atop the Vendôme Column in Paris.
Similarly, three decades ago freedom-fighters in Ukraine and Hungary knocked down statues of their historic tyrants, Lenin and Stalin. A statue of Winston Churchill, who helped save the free world from massive Nazi brutality, was vandalized in London last weekend because of racist statements he once uttered.
Alas, there is no such thing as a pure past, or present. Like everyone, leaders are filled with human frailty, bias and defects. The past provides no untainted innocents. Utopian-minded protestors, understandably angered by present-day and past atrocities, demand retribution from bronzed likenesses of leaders who, despite other achievements, have strayed from the protestors’ thin, imagined lines of currently-defined purity.
I believe this movement offers yet another signal of refocused generational shifting. In many Millennials’ and Gen Z’s view, us Boomers’ facile dismissals of such egregious wrongs merits utter distain. How dare there be a statue of slave-holder President Grant prominently displayed in San Francisco’s Golden Gate Park.
We should recognize that inter-generational criticism is a timeless truism, present throughout the past and present. Perhaps the only certainty about the future is that some aspects of today’s life will be disparaged by generations to come.
Young people inevitably are accused of having insufficient respect for their elders, enjoying outrageous music and practicing increasingly strange rituals. Conversely, today’s younger folks disparage the ignorant beliefs and behaviors of their parents and earlier generations.
Really? What beliefs and behaviors of ours could possibly be belittled? Here’s a partial list: criminalizing homosexuality, not stopping or at the very least mitigating climate change, eating meat, prohibiting women and minorities from voting and not sufficiently combatting racial, economic and social inequities. Young people and others believe slavery, although legislatively outlawed in 1865 by the Constitution’s 13th Amendment, has continued to exist in other, not so sub-rosa forms ever since. Its continued presence now needs to be halted.
Hence, the inevitable Monumental Problems.